Per the video above, being that this is the "January" of fashion, what more of a perfect
moment to highlight fashion visionary, Patricia
Field, who, in my fashion, while she doesn't consider herself to be a visionary , in my fashion, she really helped to shape the modern view of fashion, if not through my favorite movie, "The Devil Wears
Prada", or her resume of business ventures in retail, it is most
certainly through her participation in
the looks of the coveted HBO series, Sex
and the City! In my fashion, during the 90's and early millennia, “Sex and
the City” set the standard for being an independent career women during a time
when women were exploring a new reality where classic views on misogyny and
gender relations were being challenged and exploited like never before. The
fashions styled by Field during the show's run was the driving vehicle to
delivering the shows retrospective on the the female point of view—which then got me to thinking: 1) how does
a stylist translate a message effectively with clothes, and 2) what makes a
great stylist, a “great” stylist and fashion visionary?
When one thinks of the 2005 movie, "The Devil Wears
Prada", yes we first think of the insufferable, Miranda Priestly, played
by, Meryl Streep, with that glamorous white bob. We also think about the bumbling
naivete of, Andy Saks, played by Anne Hathaway. But the main reason we remember
this movie is because of the character that had no lines the entire movie—the clothes! The clothes chosen for the
movie is what furthers that voyeuristic view of the fashion industry depicted
in the movie, for which reason, I'm sure, served as a large inspiration for
those of us pursuing careers in fashion now—at least it was for me! In 2007, on the way home
from a high school class trip to New York, "The Devil Wears Prada"
was the in-house movie on the bus ride—that’s when my head space turned from "reality"
to obsessing about the glorious world of fashion. I was absolutely captivated
by the beautiful images and the possibility of being in a position that allowed
me to be surrounded with the ultimate in beauty all the time, at all times of my day. The prospect of
dealing with fabulous clothes, photographs, and gorgeous people all the while exploiting the
beauty of our world aiding in consumer’s buying decisions by suggesting what designers
around the world were producing marvelous creations seemed like a natural
progression of where to use my talents considering, at the that time, I was an
obsessive photojournalist and photographer for my school’s yearbook.
Even though I must confess, the sardonic, aloof, austere
attitude depicted of Miranda Priestly tickled me so; it is the thought of being
around physical beauty all day that energizes my love for the industry. The
movie did a good job of depicting the process of developing a world class fashion
magazine. While fictional, "The Devil Wears Prada" uses a lot of fictional use of real fashion
figures which helps to take us further behind the scenes of the fashion
industry and the people who run it. The styling of each character is, in my
fashion, what gives us that real life sense of what the fashion world should be
if we were a part of the industry ourselves. It’s as actor, Stanley Tucci
(who plays Nigel), says in one of the DVD featurettes, “Fashion is the film. We [actors] are the adjuncts to the film.” Considering
all of this, I suppose it would be accurate to say that indirectly, Patricia
Field, would qualify as one of my greatest inspirations in fashion.
AWARDS AND NOMINATIONS |
Many people are most familiar with Patricia Field from the
ever popular HBO series, Sex and the City, where she served as the show’s
costume designer. From there she went on to win many awards for her work in
film, all while owning her New YorkCity boutique, now located in the Bowery, that
has been in operation since 1960. In my fashion, “Sex and the City” will
stand as a defining expose to the beginning of the shift, and acceptance, of a
new wave of independent women of the future; women who were on the road to
becoming the women they’d always hoped to become, all the while learning to
cope with their busy, bustling environment, parallel to men. It was on the
set of “Sex and the City” that Field first worked with director, David Frankel.
He cites her as responsible for enlightening him on the effects of the tilting
of the camera to show the “entire” outfit,
including the shoes, for, “The shoes
are everything. If you don’t see the shoes you might as well not see the rest
of the outfit.”
David Frankel, also the director of “The Devil Wears Prada”, mentioned in the DVD featurettes and commentary that getting the fashion right for this film was as simple as hiring Field, and leaving the room. In his opinion, “She’s got a fantastic eye and ear for where fashion is going, and anticipating trends, and anticipating combinations.” He continues, “Nothing in fashion is totally new, but the way things are combined is new. And that’s her gift.” Wendy Finerman, the movie’s producer, proclaimed, “She’s classic, yet quirky, in every single way and pushes the envelope without ever going over the edge.” I, personally, enjoyed listening to Field’s commentary in the movie as she explains how and why she got the clothing concepts together for each character , for one can tell that her vision was very calculated, logical, and down-to-earth, while still whimsy, original, and mildly far flung. In describing the evolution of Andy Saks’ look throughout the movie from a basic, ordinary girl-next-door, into the new, edgier “textbook chic” fashion assistant, Fields explained that at the beginning of production she had 45 look changes, and with the growing scale of the movie, by the end, she had 60 look changes (a huge accomplishment in my experience). Meryl Streep had 40-45 designer coat looks, each one inconspicuous to the audience as to who designed them specifically because Fields wanted to sustain the aura of luxurious mystery as well as a level of superiority that fueled the distant work relationship between Andy, and her boss. When Field was asked about her trend forecasting abilities and how she was able to create looks for the movie that would be trendy 8-10 months ahead of the movie’s release date, she replied simply by saying, “I don’t know anything. I just try to make it look beautiful.” She continues to explain, “I think beauty is something that is attractive, and people are drawn to it.” As Frankel puts it, “She has an unerring sense of how things go together in a special way.”
Now, to most, styling
would seem an easy occupation, but what is shown in “The Devil Wears Prada” is
that fashion is not to be mocked, and that in all actuality, it is a vital
industry in our economy and everyday lives. The seemingly glam process of
inspiring consumers to like and buy certain clothes takes a person with a
discerning eye, not just for colors, and textures, and patterns. How does one develop this unerring sense of
how things go together as David Frankel describes? In my fashion, it is, one
half an open and bountifully creative mindset, and the other half a certain
distinct awareness of one’s environment and the people in it. Fashion is a
very subjective topic, and there are many points of views about fashion. A great stylist looks for those ideas and
points of views of which we have not been exposed to already. For something
to be interesting to someone, it is because the viewer is not too familiar with
the subject of interest. Now a days,
stylists understand what Frankel postulated before, that nothing in fashion is
totally new, but the way things are combined is new. It takes an intimate
knowledge of what used to be
considered attractive, what we find attractive now, and why certain people
will find certain things attractive
in the future. It is a stylist job to
understand what has been done before, so we can progress with aspirations to be
something better than we were before.
As Field says in the video above, “The best way you put yourself
together is achieving success in expressing how you feel about yourself, in
general, and at that moment, for that occasion.”
I find the reason why people would be afraid of, or “nonchalant”
towards fashion, is because fashion is very connected with our emotions. All of
us have emotions, and we all need outlets for our emotions, and for a lot of us
it is difficult to confront our true feelings. In my fashion, fashion is one
outlet for one’s emotions in that the pieces you put together
reveal and amplify aspects of your
personality that you prefer to project to clearly communicate your intentions
for what you can do in this life (and want to do in this life). When we are
able to, at a glance, accurately read a person’s personality by the way
that they present themselves, there is a certain level of respect established
in that your look shows the type of communication you prefer to have with
people. If people cannot tell this about you, there is a disconnect which leaves
the door open to the possibility of you to experience negative vibes between
you and others. We accept the love we think we deserve, and people will only
treat you as bad as you let them. In my fashion, communication begins from as
soon as you see someone, to when you part ways and don’t see each other
anymore.
No comments:
Post a Comment